Proud fans of a 128-year old tradition

It is currently Mon Sep 22, 2014 9:18 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:24 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:50 pm
Posts: 754
Get him out of there!!! He can't even sniff the plate right now!

***Ok Doubleplay will do. You get another batter!!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:43 pm
Posts: 4901
Location: Omaha, NE via Sioux City, Kansas City, and Chicago
Man, this is as uncomfortable as I've seen Hanrahan in a Pirates uniform. His follow through is all messed up. Good thing he can work the kinks out vs the Astros and get a break with the All-Star game.

That being said...


RAISE IT!!

_________________
#7 Baylor Bears (3-0) at Iowa State Cyclones (1-2)
Jack Trice Stadium
September 27, 2014
7:00 PM CST
FOX


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:27 pm
Posts: 2138
Image



Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:31 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:28 am
Posts: 1080
Stupid to pull Karstens after 88 pitches.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:10 pm
Posts: 2160
Mister Pittsburgh wrote:
Stupid to pull Karstens after 88 pitches.

Agreed. Just heard Jim Kaat saying last night that pitch counts are the dumbest thing to happen in baseball. Unless he said he was done, he should've had a chance to finish.

And I'd give Hanrahan these next. 3 days off to couple them with the All Star break...he is definitely not right.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:54 pm
Posts: 6167
Location: Keystone State
Great series for the Bucs, but you have to be concerned about Hanrahan. He doesn't look right. The good news is Grilli can step in if he has to, but that weakens your eighth. Hopefully, Joel can start throwing strikes.

_________________
The Bucs are going all the way, all the way this year!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:11 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:30 pm
Posts: 6239
He just came back from an injury guys.....Be glad we got 8 from him. The Hammer seems to be overthrowing IMHO. 8-) 8-) 8-) Beat 'em Bucs


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 12:46 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 5705
Location: 120 miles west of Iowa City
Az Bucco fan wrote:
He just came back from an injury guys.....Be glad we got 8 from him. The Hammer seems to be overthrowing IMHO. 8-) 8-) 8-) Beat 'em Bucs


Been thinking the same thing ... like throwing through a brick wall.

_________________
Reflexively, obsessively and tastelessly submitted,
No. 9
Obsessive proponent of situational bunting and 2 strike hitting approaches, reflexively pro-catchers calling good games and tasteless proponent of the value of a RBI.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 5:06 pm
Posts: 3374
Location: Westmoreland County Pennsylvania
Az Bucco fan wrote:
He just came back from an injury guys.....Be glad we got 8 from him. The Hammer seems to be overthrowing IMHO. 8-) 8-) 8-) Beat 'em Bucs


Exactly what I've been think when he's on the mound. Is it because he's losing some speed and is trying to make up for it? I don't know why he would be losing some speed though (if that's the case) unless he's just tired (if that's the case).

_________________
Image...You can observe a lot by just watching. -Yogi Berra


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:08 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 12:40 pm
Posts: 1045
Hanrahan's velocity has dipped. I'm hoping there isn't anything more to it than what has been said about him possibly overthrowing. Hopefully he doesn't pitch during the All-Star game.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:29 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:46 am
Posts: 3616
Location: Economy, PA
Chances are he'll be ok. Let's hope so anyway.

The Astros did us a huge favor by swinging the bat in the ninth. If they had just stood there I think we would have lost that game.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
PirateParrot wrote:
Mister Pittsburgh wrote:
Stupid to pull Karstens after 88 pitches.

Agreed. Just heard Jim Kaat saying last night that pitch counts are the dumbest thing to happen in baseball. Unless he said he was done, he should've had a chance to finish.

Once again, we are forgetting what has made Karstens effective: lack of fatigue. Look at the pitch counts that Karstens was on last year, and compare them to the pitch counts he had in previous years. Notice the difference?

What made Karstens an effective pitcher was Hurdle limiting his pitch count to approximately 90 pitches per outing. Karstens's biggest flaw is his lack of stamina, but that flaw can be mitigated by not having him pitch as long as his fellow starting pitchers. Yes, the drawback is that he'll pitch fewer innings on average than the other members of the rotation, but that's a small price to pay for the truly effective innings he provides, as we saw last night.

And Jim Kaat can shove it. Not every pitcher in the league can be gifted with a rubber arm that can throw complete games like he could. There's a reason why he had a super short career as a pitching coach: he lacks perspective. He has no idea what he's talking about here.

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:27 pm
Posts: 2138
If your pitcher has a shot at a complete game, he's still dealing/ showing no signs of fatigue, and your closer is up for his third game, I think you give him the ball in the 9th.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 2:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
RTJR wrote:
If your pitcher has a shot at a complete game, he's still dealing/ showing no signs of fatigue, and your closer is up for his third game, I think you give him the ball in the 9th.

And if your pitcher is having only his third outing since recovering from injury and has a history of breaking down after 90 pitches, and the game is close, I think you go to your bullpen to preserve the physical health of your pitcher as well as the integrity of the lead.

There's no reason why Hurdle had to go to Hanrahan; Grilli or even Hughes could have handled that 9th inning.

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 12:27 pm
Posts: 407
Location: Morgantown, WV, via Charleston, WV
Willton wrote:
Karstens's biggest flaw is his lack of stamina, but that flaw can be mitigated by not having him pitch as long as his fellow starting pitchers.


Great point, Willton. I was at the game, and was critical of the move (wanting to see a complete game, and blaming the move on Hurdle wanting to pad Hanrahan's save's total). But, you make an excellent point. If he can save some for the stretch run, we'll all forget about this. Glad you pointed it out.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 3:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 05, 2011 5:27 pm
Posts: 2138
Willton wrote:
RTJR wrote:
If your pitcher has a shot at a complete game, he's still dealing/ showing no signs of fatigue, and your closer is up for his third game, I think you give him the ball in the 9th.

And if your pitcher is having only his third outing since recovering from injury and has a history of breaking down after 90 pitches, and the game is close, I think you go to your bullpen to preserve the physical health of your pitcher as well as the integrity of the lead.

There's no reason why Hurdle had to go to Hanrahan; Grilli or even Hughes could have handled that 9th inning.


One more inning would not have hurt Karstens at all. Given that he is so fresh, doubly so. If they're concerned about his injury, he has no business being on the mound and should still be on the DL.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:00 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:28 am
Posts: 1080
Willton wrote:
RTJR wrote:
If your pitcher has a shot at a complete game, he's still dealing/ showing no signs of fatigue, and your closer is up for his third game, I think you give him the ball in the 9th.

And if your pitcher is having only his third outing since recovering from injury and has a history of breaking down after 90 pitches, and the game is close, I think you go to your bullpen to preserve the physical health of your pitcher as well as the integrity of the lead.

There's no reason why Hurdle had to go to Hanrahan; Grilli or even Hughes could have handled that 9th inning.


Nope, with that easy outting and 6 pitch 8th Karstens should of got the ball. Why go from a known, Karstens in total control of the game, to an unknown, in which Hanrahan is going to climb the mound? Go with the known until it fails you. Karstens was at 86 pitches...could of easily finished under 100.

Also, hasn't Hanrahan put at least one guy on in most of his last dozen saves?


Last edited by Dr. Phibes on Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:03 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:03 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Mon May 23, 2011 12:40 pm
Posts: 1045
There was an interview with Karstens on the post game show. Karstens said that Hurdle asked him how he (Karstens) felt. Karstens said that he felt fine but was hesitant to attempt a complete game because of the two run lead not being big enough. Had it been 3-0, he would have taken the mound to start the 9th inning. Karstens said that he didn't want to give up a double and then have Hanrahan come in to clean up his mess and the he preferred to have Hanrahan finish the game with no one on base to start the inning.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
Mister Pittsburgh wrote:
Willton wrote:
RTJR wrote:
If your pitcher has a shot at a complete game, he's still dealing/ showing no signs of fatigue, and your closer is up for his third game, I think you give him the ball in the 9th.

And if your pitcher is having only his third outing since recovering from injury and has a history of breaking down after 90 pitches, and the game is close, I think you go to your bullpen to preserve the physical health of your pitcher as well as the integrity of the lead.

There's no reason why Hurdle had to go to Hanrahan; Grilli or even Hughes could have handled that 9th inning.


Nope, with that easy outting and 6 pitch 8th Karstens should of got the ball. Why go from a known, Karstens in total control of the game, to an unknown, in which Hanrahan is going to climb the mound? Go with the known until it fails you. Karstens was at 86 pitches...could of easily finished under 100.

100 isn't the magic number for Karstens; 90 is. You're speaking in generalities; I'm speaking with specific reference to Karstens. Not all pitchers are built the same. Isn't it No. 9 who constantly preaches considering the entire situation on a case by case basis? Well, Karstens is not your typical case.

And when did Hanrahan or Grilli become unknown commodities? Isn't Hanrahan the closer because he's known to be effective? When did he become some sort of wild card?

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: 07-05-12 Pirates (45-36) vs Astros (32-50)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 06, 2012 4:06 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:28 am
Posts: 1080
Tommy Gunn wrote:
There was an interview with Karstens on the post game show. Karstens said that Hurdle asked him how he (Karstens) felt. Karstens said that he felt fine but was hesitant to attempt a complete game because of the two run lead not being big enough. Had it been 3-0, he would have taken the mound to start the 9th inning. Karstens said that he didn't want to give up a double and then have Hanrahan come in to clean up his mess and the he preferred to have Hanrahan finish the game with no one on base to start the inning.


Nice self confidence after a 6 pitch 8th....


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits