Proud fans of a 128-year old tradition

It is currently Fri Nov 21, 2014 11:53 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:55 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3364
Location: Wheeling, WV
I wonder who has more Strike outs. Last time I checked you can't score or even move a guy up a base if you SO. Lot's been said about Bay reducing his Ks this year -- just wondering?

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:02 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3364
Location: Wheeling, WV
just checked Bay 60 Nady 43-- once again Bay leads

Ave. Bay .283 Nady .314
RBI Bay 40 Nady 49

AB Bay 269 Nady 245

Bay does have almost as many doubles 18-16 and is ahead in several catagories.

It is clear that Bay is far superior player???

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:52 pm
Posts: 5516
Location: Pittsburgh
IA Pirate wrote:
I'd take a team full of Nady's and put them up against a team full of Bay's any day of the week.

You'd lose well over 100 games.

_________________
"Enjoy every sandwich." - Warren Zevon


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:43 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Omaha, NE via Sioux City, Kansas City, and Chicago
sisyphus wrote:
IA Pirate wrote:
I'd take a team full of Nady's and put them up against a team full of Bay's any day of the week.

You'd lose well over 100 games.


How so? I've seen Freddy Sanchez, Freddy Sanchez, intentionally walked at least twice this season to get to Bay in a late-game situation. Jason Bay has two walk-off hits in his entire career. Amazingly they happened on back-to-back days! I don't know about you but I want someone on my team that doesn't have onions that shrink up in a tight spot.

_________________
Texas Tech Red Raiders (3-6) at Iowa State Cyclones (2-7)
Jack Trice Stadium
November 22, 2014 11:00 AM
Fox Sports 1


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 7:48 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:26 pm
Posts: 3006
sisyphus wrote:
IA Pirate wrote:
I'd take a team full of Nady's and put them up against a team full of Bay's any day of the week.

You'd lose well over 100 games.


I wonder what their respective ERA's would be??!! :shock:


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:52 pm
Posts: 5516
Location: Pittsburgh
IA Pirate wrote:
sisyphus wrote:
IA Pirate wrote:
I'd take a team full of Nady's and put them up against a team full of Bay's any day of the week.

You'd lose well over 100 games.


How so?

By scoring way fewer runs than the all-Bay team.

Quote:
I've seen Freddy Sanchez, Freddy Sanchez, intentionally walked at least twice this season to get to Bay in a late-game situation. Jason Bay has two walk-off hits in his entire career. Amazingly they happened on back-to-back days! I don't know about you but I want someone on my team that doesn't have onions that shrink up in a tight spot.

Jason Bay's career OPS with runners in scoring position: .920

Xavier Nady's career OPS with runners in scoring position: .745

That doesn't even consider that the All-Bays will be hitting with runners in scoring position a hell of a lot more often than the All-Nadys will.

_________________
"Enjoy every sandwich." - Warren Zevon


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 7:01 pm
Posts: 7285
BBF wrote:
sisyphus wrote:
IA Pirate wrote:
I'd take a team full of Nady's and put them up against a team full of Bay's any day of the week.

You'd lose well over 100 games.


I wonder what their respective ERA's would be??!! :shock:


I dont know if Bay's arm would allow him to put anything on the ball if he was pitching...Nady's got more zip

_________________
I say keep the $50 and ban him anyway...

For those jumping ship, we'll keep the bandwagon warm for you...


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
IA Pirate wrote:
sisyphus wrote:
IA Pirate wrote:
I'd take a team full of Nady's and put them up against a team full of Bay's any day of the week.

You'd lose well over 100 games.


How so? I've seen Freddy Sanchez, Freddy Sanchez, intentionally walked at least twice this season to get to Bay in a late-game situation. Jason Bay has two walk-off hits in his entire career. Amazingly they happened on back-to-back days! I don't know about you but I want someone on my team that doesn't have onions that shrink up in a tight spot.

There's more to baseball than the 9th inning. Your focus on late-game situations largely ignores the work that players do during the rest of the game that is more outcome-determinative than what happens in a limited number of "clutch" situations.

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 5891
Location: 120 miles west of Iowa City
Willton wrote:
There's more to baseball than the 9th inning. Your focus on late-game situations largely ignores the work that players do during the rest of the game that is more outcome-determinative than what happens in a limited number of "clutch" situations.


Like how a player performs when he comes up with runners in scoring position? Or is that just luck?

_________________
Reflexively, obsessively and tastelessly submitted,
No. 9
Obsessive proponent of situational bunting and 2 strike hitting approaches, reflexively pro-catchers calling good games and tasteless proponent of the value of a RBI.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:23 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:26 pm
Posts: 3006
Argentum wrote:
[Man, maybe someone can chime in hear about Bay's perceived lack of hitting in the "clutch"! Then we'd have a taboo trifecta.


IA Pirate wrote:
I don't know about you but I want someone on my team that doesn't have onions that shrink up in a tight spot.


Ask and ye shall receive, SA.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:52 pm
Posts: 5516
Location: Pittsburgh
No. 9 wrote:
Willton wrote:
There's more to baseball than the 9th inning. Your focus on late-game situations largely ignores the work that players do during the rest of the game that is more outcome-determinative than what happens in a limited number of "clutch" situations.


Like how a player performs when he comes up with runners in scoring position? Or is that just luck?

A large sample size is more significant than a small sample size. Always.

However, in this case, we have somebody arguing that Nady is more of a clutch hitter despite the fact that Bay hits much, much better with runners in scoring position, so there is no point in making the argument that there is no evidence that clutch hitting is a repeatable skill.

_________________
"Enjoy every sandwich." - Warren Zevon


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
No. 9 wrote:
Willton wrote:
There's more to baseball than the 9th inning. Your focus on late-game situations largely ignores the work that players do during the rest of the game that is more outcome-determinative than what happens in a limited number of "clutch" situations.


Like how a player performs when he comes up with runners in scoring position? Or is that just luck?

No, because once again, that's thinking too narrowly. There's more to baseball than RISP opportunities. You need to realize that the plate appearances with no RISP is just as important as those with RISP, as plate appearances with no men on is an opportunity to create a situation with RISP (or score outright with a homerun).

Further, how one does with RISP tends to mirror how one does in all situations. For instance, Bay has a career line of .281/.377/.516 overall and .284/.397/.523 with RISP. As you can see, making the distinction does not tell us much.

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 9:31 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 5891
Location: 120 miles west of Iowa City
Willton wrote:
You need to realize that the plate appearances with no RISP is just as important as those with RISP, as plate appearances with no men on is an opportunity to create a situation with RISP (or score outright with a homerun).


LaRoche at-bat in the third inning, runners on second and third, one out. Bucs down 4-2.
LaRoche at-bat in the ninth inning, no one on base, one out. Bucs down 4-2.

How LaRoche performs in the ninth is "just as important" as how he performs in the third?

I understand (or "realize" as you put it) that getting on base is part of trying to create runs. But getting those runs home is how games are won or lost. You'll never be able to convince me that all plate appearances are equivalent (or, in your words, "just as important") to one another. Just as you were never able to convince me that an out is an out is an out.

_________________
Reflexively, obsessively and tastelessly submitted,
No. 9
Obsessive proponent of situational bunting and 2 strike hitting approaches, reflexively pro-catchers calling good games and tasteless proponent of the value of a RBI.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 2:11 pm
Posts: 5891
Location: 120 miles west of Iowa City
Here's a question for you . . . was Abreu's AB in the third inning last night "just as important" as his AB in the ninth inning last night?

_________________
Reflexively, obsessively and tastelessly submitted,
No. 9
Obsessive proponent of situational bunting and 2 strike hitting approaches, reflexively pro-catchers calling good games and tasteless proponent of the value of a RBI.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
No. 9 wrote:
Here's a question for you . . . was Abreu's AB in the third inning last night "just as important" as his AB in the ninth inning last night?

As far as evaluating a player is concerned, which is what we're doing here with Nady and Bay, yes, it was.

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Wed Jun 25, 2008 2:36 pm 
Willton wrote:
No. 9 wrote:
Here's a question for you . . . was Abreu's AB in the third inning last night "just as important" as his AB in the ninth inning last night?

As far as evaluating a player is concerned, which is what we're doing here with Nady and Bay, yes, it was.


I disagree. WHEN a player gets a hit or doesn't get a hit is hugely important. The goal is to win games, and the WHEN is a huge factor in that.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Thu Jun 26, 2008 12:41 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
Elmer wrote:
Willton wrote:
No. 9 wrote:
Here's a question for you . . . was Abreu's AB in the third inning last night "just as important" as his AB in the ninth inning last night?

As far as evaluating a player is concerned, which is what we're doing here with Nady and Bay, yes, it was.


I disagree. WHEN a player gets a hit or doesn't get a hit is hugely important. The goal is to win games, and the WHEN is a huge factor in that.

I agree as far as winning games are concerned, but when it comes to evaluating how well a player plays, focusing on narrowly tailored situations loses sight of the player's true value. It is for these reasons that people overrate players like Joe Carter and Ruben Sierra and underrate players like Jason Bay. A broader perspective is needed.

Players do not pick and choose when they get hits; if they could, they'd hit all the time. Players can control the frequency at which they get their hits, but they do not control the "when" that you speak of to any degree of certainty. That's why asking silly questions, such as the one No. 9 asked above, does not advance the discussion.

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2008 4:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:52 pm
Posts: 5516
Location: Pittsburgh
No. 9 wrote:
Willton wrote:
You need to realize that the plate appearances with no RISP is just as important as those with RISP, as plate appearances with no men on is an opportunity to create a situation with RISP (or score outright with a homerun).


LaRoche at-bat in the third inning, runners on second and third, one out. Bucs down 4-2.
LaRoche at-bat in the ninth inning, no one on base, one out. Bucs down 4-2.

How LaRoche performs in the ninth is "just as important" as how he performs in the third?

I understand (or "realize" as you put it) that getting on base is part of trying to create runs. But getting those runs home is how games are won or lost. You'll never be able to convince me that all plate appearances are equivalent (or, in your words, "just as important") to one another. Just as you were never able to convince me that an out is an out is an out.

The problem with your scenario is that the first example probably comes up 10 times as often as the second, but you're treating them as equals.

_________________
"Enjoy every sandwich." - Warren Zevon


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits