Proud fans of a 128-year old tradition

It is currently Wed Apr 16, 2014 6:53 pm

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: bay and nady
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 3173
Location: Darlington, Pennsylvania
i read on yahoo's baseball section that we might be looking to trade jason bay and xaiver nady.do u think this is for real or do u think the pirates are just trying to c what offers they could get


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 1:00 am
Posts: 2782
It's definitely true that Bay and Nady are both "on the block" if you will when it comes to the trade deadline. Whether anything actually happens is up for debate, and well, we won't know until it happens.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Mon Jun 23, 2008 1:42 pm 
TheShark wrote:
It's definitely true that Bay and Nady are both "on the block" if you will when it comes to the trade deadline. Whether anything actually happens is up for debate, and well, we won't know until it happens.


I think they'll trade one. I don't think they'll trade both.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:07 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:28 pm
Posts: 2169
Nady is not even close to what bay brings to the team. I think we should look to deal nady and laroche.

_________________
0 straight losing seasons


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:13 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 5:32 pm
Posts: 3173
Location: Darlington, Pennsylvania
I agree.If we can get are worth for Nady right now i say we take it.He might be as good as he is going to get right now.On the other hand Bay's best days are still infront of him.Laroche needs traded to but i don't think the time to trade him is now.He needs to do better to get his stock up first.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 8:55 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3352
Location: Wheeling, WV
Of course you have hit on the real issue here. When players are doing well, i.e. Bay now, no one wants to trade him and think he's going to be better as time goes on.

But if we are building for the future, then Bay will not be part of that future because after next season, his value to this team will be less than his salary because of our limited finances. So, he'll be gone anyway as we try to get competitive.

If all that's true, then he must be traded now, the sooner the better to return the type of players that will enhance our future.
It will be very unpopular with fans but it looks to be the only way for us to get quality young kids in addition to the draft. Almost everyone agrees that we need good drafts and more to build a winner.

And for what it's worth, Nady is the better player in my mind. We've argued this before, so I don't want to re-visit it. Just want to say that not everyone thinks Bay is better.

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:41 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:22 pm
Posts: 2495
Substitute2 wrote:
But if we are building for the future, then Bay will not be part of that future because after next season, his value to this team will be less than his salary because of our limited finances. .


Bay is a steal for what he is currently being paid.

Substitute2 wrote:
And for what it's worth, Nady is the better player in my mind. We've argued this before, so I don't want to re-visit it. Just want to say that not everyone thinks Bay is better.


Not looking to re-visit or start a fight, but Nady isn't even in the same ballbark (pun intended) with Bay talentwise. A few more weeks of playing will prove that. It sucks Nady got hurt (again!) because we need to foist him off on somebody sooner, not later.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 9:58 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3352
Location: Wheeling, WV
For the Pirates he will not be worthit in 2010. And let's wait a month and see if this streaky hitter stays hot. It would be uncharacteristic if he does, but I hope he plays out of his mind... then is traded.

Remind me of which player can play only one position, remind me who has the highest Batting average, remind me who has the most RBIs even though he has been injured (by his agressive play going after a ball), and remind me which of them has the better arm.

I guess you're right their is no competition as to the better player.

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:01 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3352
Location: Wheeling, WV
BTW, I am also of the view that both of them need traded and as soon as possible. But Nady may need a few weeks to show that he is healthy again.

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:14 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:22 pm
Posts: 2495
Substitute2 wrote:
For the Pirates he will not be worthit in 2010. And let's wait a month and see if this streaky hitter stays hot. It would be uncharacteristic if he does, but I hope he plays out of his mind... then is traded.


Bay has always been streaky. However, unlike a lot of other hot/cold hitters, the time he spends between hot and cold is usually short.

Substitute2 wrote:
Remind me of which player can play only one position, remind me who has the highest Batting average, remind me who has the most RBIs even though he has been injured (by his agressive play going after a ball), and remind me which of them has the better arm.


Nady is a below average hitter in RF and 1B. There I said it. He had a great May. Bay is above avaerage in LF. Which would you rather have?

Oh goody, the old RBI debate. How many runs has Nady scored? I'll give you a hint, not even close to Bay. Nady has benefitted greatly from having Bay and Mclouth bat in front of him. There's your RBI's. If Bay and Nady reversed positions in the line-up, Bay would have more RBI.

Man, maybe someone can chime in hear about Bay's perceived lack of hitting in the "clutch"! Then we'd have a taboo trifecta.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:22 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
Substitute2 wrote:
For the Pirates he will not be worthit in 2010. And let's wait a month and see if this streaky hitter stays hot. It would be uncharacteristic if he does, but I hope he plays out of his mind... then is traded.

Remind me of which player can play only one position, remind me who has the highest Batting average, remind me who has the most RBIs even though he has been injured (by his agressive play going after a ball), and remind me which of them has the better arm.

I guess you're right their is no competition as to the better player.

Remind me who walks more. Remind me who gets on base more. Remind me who hits more homeruns. Remind me who hits more extra-base hits. Remind me who scores more runs. Remind me who is a better baserunner. And remind me who has a better track record.

The answer is clear: Bay is the better player.

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:10 pm
Posts: 1915
This is not even a legitimate argument. Nady has never stayed healthy or played full time for a whole season, so how you could say he is better is beyond me. I like Nady, but honestly you can't possibly think he is better than Bay. He has a better throwing arm...that's it! Over the long haul Bay will have more hits, HR's, etc. He is a better runner too now that he is back to being healthy.

Nady is a good, solid player and seems like a good clubhouse guy from all indications. Bay is an all star when he is healthy. He is an average defender with a weak arm, but Nady doesn't exactly get a gold glove over in right field either. Nady can play first base and at some point Bay may too.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 10:48 am 
Argentum wrote:
Substitute2 wrote:
For the Pirates he will not be worthit in 2010. And let's wait a month and see if this streaky hitter stays hot. It would be uncharacteristic if he does, but I hope he plays out of his mind... then is traded.


Bay has always been streaky. However, unlike a lot of other hot/cold hitters, the time he spends between hot and cold is usually short.

Substitute2 wrote:
Remind me of which player can play only one position, remind me who has the highest Batting average, remind me who has the most RBIs even though he has been injured (by his agressive play going after a ball), and remind me which of them has the better arm.


Nady is a below average hitter in RF and 1B. There I said it. He had a great May. Bay is above avaerage in LF. Which would you rather have?

Oh goody, the old RBI debate. How many runs has Nady scored? I'll give you a hint, not even close to Bay. Nady has benefitted greatly from having Bay and Mclouth bat in front of him. There's your RBI's. If Bay and Nady reversed positions in the line-up, Bay would have more RBI.

Man, maybe someone can chime in hear about Bay's perceived lack of hitting in the "clutch"! Then we'd have a taboo trifecta.


I think Bay is better than Nady, but I wouldn't call Nady an average hitter. I'd give him a little more credit than that.

I would be in favor of trading either or both so long as the return is good. I don't expect them to deal both, though. I think only one will go.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 11:20 am 
Offline
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:43 pm
Posts: 4711
Location: Omaha, NE via Sioux City, Kansas City, and Chicago
I'd take a team full of Nady's and put them up against a team full of Bay's any day of the week. The makeup of the team is finally getting better with guys like McLouth, Doumit, and Nady out there. They bust their ass every game. I remember a game towards the end of the season in '06 where a base hit dropped right in front of Bay. He could have made an attempt at it but decided to pull up and just let it drop. The Pirates announcers (I can't remember who it was) sounded frustrated by the effort. I've never seen Nady go less than 100%. Is Bay a better baseball player? Maybe. I also know that if Bay played in a market bigger than Pittsburgh he would get swallowed whole by the media and fans for his lack of "perceived" passion.

_________________
#3 Iowa State Cyclones vs #7 Connecticut Huskies
Sweet Sixteen
March Madness!!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:21 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3352
Location: Wheeling, WV
Yea, his last down time was from early June 2007 til Late May 2008.
Is that an example of his short slumps?

Mclouth batted much closer to Bay for the purpose of driving in runs.
Nady had to depend on Bay getting on which didn't happen often in April and May except for walks.

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 12:58 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:46 am
Posts: 3198
Location: Economy, PA
Nady is good but Bay is a lot better, in every facet except throwing.

I would trade them both, but only if I got a good young outfielder in return. McCutcheon looks to be ready, but I wouldn't want to fill 2 spots from what we have available.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 1:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 WWW  Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:43 pm
Posts: 4711
Location: Omaha, NE via Sioux City, Kansas City, and Chicago
In no way can you say either is leaps and bound better than the other. You especially can't say that Bay is far superior to Nady. Look at the last two years stats.

Nady '07 .278 20 HRs 72 RBI 23 2B 55 Runs 125 games 431 At Bats
Nady '08 .314 10 HRs 49 RBI 18 2B 36 Runs 66 games 245 At Bats

Bay '07 .247 21 HRs 84 RBI 25 2B 78 Runs 145 games 538 At Bats
Bay '08 .283 15 HRs 40 RBI 16 2B 54 Runs 74 games 269 At Bats


It looks very, very similar to me. I'd say Bay has the overwhelming advantage in his durability. As far as the production when playing Nady has the advantage. Nady also has the better arm.

It's close but if you include intangibles I'd take Nady.

_________________
#3 Iowa State Cyclones vs #7 Connecticut Huskies
Sweet Sixteen
March Madness!!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 2:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:10 pm
Posts: 1915
I'm stunned by this debate. Nady can't even stay healthy for a full year. Other teams didn't even think he was good enough to be a regular. He has proven them wrong. When healthy he is definitely an every day player. However his skill set isn't even close to Bay's. Bay had a couple bum knees the last 2 seasons and played through it. He didn't use it as an excuse. As a matter of fact nobody really knew about his knee two years ago he was so tight lipped about it. Last year the knees finally caught up to him. On offense he has more power, better OBP, way more speed on the bases. That pretty much covers it there. On defense he is better at running down balls, although I agree that he doesn't take a lot of chances. He also gets bad breaks on balls sometimes, but I've seen Nady head in the wrong direction on more than one occasion too. Obviously Nady's arm(and every little leaguer around) is better than Bay's. So to me it appears that there is no argument. I don't get it really. And I don't care what market Bay plays in, his skills will be the same. Didn't know it was a requirement to be a loud, obnoxious ass to play the game. Heck when he did speak up this off season(rightfully so) he got fried!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 4:44 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:46 am
Posts: 3198
Location: Economy, PA
Let's see if I can summarize...

Bay has more power, draws more walks, steals more bases, covers more ground in the outfield.
Nady has a better arm.

Yep, it's a tossup!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: bay and nady
PostPosted: Tue Jun 24, 2008 6:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:18 pm
Posts: 5060
Location: Scotch Plains, NJ
Substitute2 wrote:
Yea, his last down time was from early June 2007 til Late May 2008.
Is that an example of his short slumps?

Mclouth batted much closer to Bay for the purpose of driving in runs.
Nady had to depend on Bay getting on which didn't happen often in April and May except for walks.

Didn't happen often? Bay had an OBP of .385 and .435 in April and May respectively. That's pretty damn often -- easily among the best in the league. Discounting Bay's walks makes little sense when you are talking specifically about Bay getting on base. The best players at getting on base typically walk a ton.

_________________
"For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."
~H. L. Mencken


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 38 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], val and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits